The Importance of Managing Risk Quality

One possible reason that insurers might need to regularly perform the difficult and expensive process of calculating Economic Capital is that they lack any significant Risk Quality control process.  They do not know the quality of the risks that they write and they have no existing process for monitoring changes in risk quality and acting upon those changes to bring risk quality back into line.

What is this mysterious Risk Quality, you ask?

Risk Quality if the amount of risk per unit of business activity.

The bottom up risk management process would then be to define the acceptable levels of Risk Quality for a business and then to establish a risk underwriting process to determine the Risk Quality at time of consideration for acceptance, processes for modifying the inherent Risk Quality to achieve an acceptable Risk Quality at time of acceptance.  Then during the exposure period, the Risk Quality would be monitored to determine whether it had changed and if there was a change that caused the residual risk to now be unacceptable, the risk manager would undertake to again take steps to bring the risk back into the acceptable range.

With the Risk Quality bottom up type risk management system, the responsibility of to central staff is to verify whether the risk quality pieces add up to an acceptable amount of risk.  If they do, then the business unit managers have a clear process to manage.  They have a risk budget in the aggregate.  They know that their expected mix of business among the different classes of risk quality will fit with that budget, so their management process then can focus on the trade-offs between the different classes.

The quantum of risk can be calculated by a simple formula then:

Total Risk = Sum over all risk classes of (Risk per unit of business activity X amount of business activity) – diversification adjustment. 

Explore posts in the same categories: Enterprise Risk Management


You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

2 Comments on “The Importance of Managing Risk Quality”

  1. riskviews Says:

    You will want business units to be doing at least two different measures of risk. One will be the measure that works best for corporate purposes. The other will be the measure that works best for the business. Some business execs suggest that will be too complicated and that there will be conflicting signals from two different measures.

    Welcome to the real world. Anointing one measure does not simplify the world, but it will simplify your decision making. Sort of like telling a football player “don’t look right or left, just look ahead. That really simplifies things for him.

    The measure that works best for corporate may be the one that is required by regulators, or they can decide that they need to use something else. So they will need two.

    Which measures? tell me more about their business. Is their business long tailed, short tailed, subject to massive volatility or to mega cat risks? Is there much uncertainty in their risk measurement process? Do they care at all (or are they forced to care) what happens to their counterparties in the event of bankruptcy of the firm? Do they have ready access to capital or do they feel that they need to provide their own funding, especially after a major loss?

  2. Rolande Mbatchou Says:

    “Amount of Risk Per Unit” – I understand the concept but which risk measure would you use to value this in order to ensure that the different business units are using the same methodology (for comparability purpose) ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: