<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Risk Language Needs to be Learned &#8211; By the Risk Officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riskviews.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/risk-language-needs-to-be-learned-by-the-risk-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riskviews.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/risk-language-needs-to-be-learned-by-the-risk-officer/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Risk and ERM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 02:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxjrudolph</title>
		<link>http://riskviews.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/risk-language-needs-to-be-learned-by-the-risk-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-9036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maxjrudolph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskviews.wordpress.com/?p=3713#comment-9036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Riskviews comments but would add that companies that ignore external definitions send a negative message to outside providers of oversight like auditors, rating agencies and regulators that the firm is behind the curve when it comes to managing risk. You should know when your definitions vary within a firm as well as with external discussions, consciously making a decision to continue, change, or educate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Riskviews comments but would add that companies that ignore external definitions send a negative message to outside providers of oversight like auditors, rating agencies and regulators that the firm is behind the curve when it comes to managing risk. You should know when your definitions vary within a firm as well as with external discussions, consciously making a decision to continue, change, or educate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Sosbee</title>
		<link>http://riskviews.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/risk-language-needs-to-be-learned-by-the-risk-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-9003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Sosbee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskviews.wordpress.com/?p=3713#comment-9003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent observation and point that the risk manager should facilitate the organization&#039;s risk language not mandate it.  However, I have to disagree on the idea that various units can operate under  different risk definitions.  That is a recipe for disaster when the organization has to pull together.  Everyone has to be on the same page and using the same common language.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent observation and point that the risk manager should facilitate the organization&#8217;s risk language not mandate it.  However, I have to disagree on the idea that various units can operate under  different risk definitions.  That is a recipe for disaster when the organization has to pull together.  Everyone has to be on the same page and using the same common language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
